Find a Lawyer

NOOR SHAH versus THE STATE

Article 2 3033/3334 // 34 ????? Definition of evidence The testimony of the prosecution was put to a rigorous and rigorous examination for rigorous examination, but there was nothing out of their mouths that could have raised doubts about the prosecution's case. ? , No question was raised due to misidentification, in the circumstances each accused was designated as a special character and the specific weapon of the crime prosecution case was also recovered as medical evidence, site plan as well as blank and two plastic dots. Conditions were also supported. The defendant's confessional statement also proved to be his fault, in which one of the defendants presented a detailed explanation, saying that the confessional statement was regularly proved by ocular evidence, admitting that there were some contradictions, but the prosecution's The statements of witnesses have been recorded almost two years after the incident, with minor contradictions in their state saying that matters for the prosecution could not be fatal, the Investigation Officer did his best to give the accused some relief, But even then these privileges did not help the defense record that the complaining party was empty-handed and The accused party was armed, and upon its request the defendant's self-defense was enhanced, it had no weight The prosecution had proved its case otherwise the accused had made their presence on the spot, and the presence of the complaining party. Confessed, although in the various trial courts, in the circumstances, the culprit was truly punished and sentenced. In a circumstance, a reasonable decision passed by a trial court cannot be interfered with in an appeal. top advocates from Village Sunder lawyer