Find a Lawyer

MST, ATTA JAN ALIAS TAJ BEGUM versus ABDUR RAHIM

The defendants for section 8 and 42 suit declaration and occupation claim that the claimant claiming to be the purchaser of the suit property from the unregistered sale deed in 19 5 1967 at Rs 99/2, but such sale The work was not done in the Revenue Record, but in the year following his death, in the year 1973, his legacy mutation was confirmed in his favor by the defendant in 1975 on the basis of such sale process. Confirmed the sale mutation in favor and then the seller suits the plaintiffs challenged the unregistered sale deadline and the validation of the sales mutation on that basis. In the trial case's order, several cases were filed in favor of the defendants in the trial court's order and the defendants thereafter, which were deemed correct by the appellate court. Was, through controversial findings of fact, obtained the final courts below. The sale process in favor of the defendants and subsequent vendors was declared illegal, fraudulent, irresponsible: rationale and ineffective: the rights of the defendants to result in any illegal, irregularities Did not encounter Whether or not to read misleading statements or evidence through its decision, the appellate court directed the executive court to evaluate the market value of the sites purchased by Theta and to pay its advance payment to the defendant. Fetch from Conditions famous high court advocate from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer