Find a Lawyer

PEER ZAHOOR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Section 295C was charged with defining evidence that he was accused of preaching against the commands of Allaah in which he was allegedly published in a pamphlet called Faizan e Qalandari in which he allegedly defied the word. I had made a change and also made a critical comment in honor of the Holy Prophet. The statements of the prosecution's witnesses revealed that the subpoena was not, nor was it published, nor preached of its contents, stating that the premises were not recovered from the accused's possession. Religious enmity was prevalent in this area or at the time of its occurrence, and it was a material fact that all the important thing that was pressed by the complainant was that the tire chain of evidence was missing and that there were serious defects in the evidence. There were ample evidence that the case against the accused was filled with countless serious doubts and the statements of the prosecution witnesses were honest and Did not and never did. Credible, accusatory pamphlet was not established at all, by the accused, to convey it to the public, to convey his views, further publication and publication of this leaflet by the accused or his statement, no one has been accused of it. The charge against was not upheld. Preaching against the commands of Allah Tubarak was not a place of preaching, nor the time of preaching, nor the persons who were preached by the accused, which was disclosed by the witnesses, it is legal that the cell must Beyond any doubt in printing and publishing the page. No one had alleged that he had published the print as an accused immigration advocates email from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer