Find a Lawyer

PROF. ALLAH RAKHA versus THE STATE

The appeal against the charges of breach of sections 417 and 421 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b) and 34 of the accused was that when the incident took place in his house, he was convicted in the adjournment case. Cannot be relieved of its responsibility for While the court acquitted the accused, it was observed that the accused did not play any role in the commission of the murder of the deceased, even though the incident took place in his house, but only by the fact that he Could not be sufficiently and satisfactorily attached to the charge. The Qatal-Um trial court also observed that nothing was disclosed in the statements of the prosecution witnesses against the accused, it did not disclose anything, indicating that the accused had proved himself guilty. Or played a role in the plotting of the conspiracies. From the acquittal of the accused, to the extent of acquittal the accused was not broken, nor was any arbitrary decision, which was record-based, neither transient nor ard nor fictitious. immigration advocate from Alipur lawyer