Find a Lawyer

FAZAL ELAHI RANA versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Section 17 (1A) (a) Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1978, R5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Compulsory retirement before the end of the disciplinary proceedings until its logical end, the service dismissed the appeal of a public servant in a job that the authority's orders under section 17 (1A) (a) of the WAPDA Act are final. The main reason was to show that it was not corrupt or incompetent, but that it was a complaint made by a widow government employee, despite suspension, but the relevant authority He could not be blamed for failing to provide a statement of defeat, which broke the bead retirement. The order was completely silent and no reason was mentioned. Government employee's appeal was decided without any reason The government employee was unaware of the relay, the order of suspension from the job found mention of his way of departing from public service because of disciplinary proceedings. The final form cannot be finalized, so the service tribunal decided on appeal in a random manner, thus its decision cannot be determined. In a speaking Supreme Court, the appeal was accepted, keeping the unwanted decisions aside, with the direction of immediately restoring public servants to be admissible under the rules, and the authority freely subject to all legal exceptions and updated Will initiate legal proceedings. tax advocates from Kamra lawyer