Find a Lawyer

QASIM ALI SHAH versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Article 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Stability Operation Stability Options, Failure to Follow the Current Revenue Record, Dissatisfaction with the Applicability of the Jurisdiction Stable Was Not Satisfied And the request for change was intercepted by the respondents. Before the Board of Revenue was allowed to amend the Board of Revenue and the changes were set aside, the applicants 'complaint was that the High Court had already decided in 1935, and that the parties' shares were decided. Stability officials rightly took action on that basis. He said that the decision of justification of the High Court decision on which the controversial variations were approved was presented in early 1935 and the applicants did not get the same procedure as the High Court Judge. The case presented by was dismissed in the interest of the defendants only. And that could not be the basis for the approval of the controversial changes, if after a period of 60 years, applicants would like to claim their claim on the disputed land, they would have to approve the controversial deviation during the stabilization process. A separate lawsuit will be filed with the Stability Authority. The current Revenue Record was properly maintained by the High Court, which was refused by the Board of Revenue Liu to appeal. best law firms from Sambrial lawyer