HAFIZ NAZIR AHMED versus HAFIZ KALEEM ULLAH
The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) suit for the claimants claimed that the suit house purchased in the name of the defendant (elder brother) was jointly owned by the trial court. The suit's decision was upheld by the appellate court and has been revised by. The High Court's accuracy was that both brothers were living in the same house with separate kitchens. Both brothers' money was purchased through proof of credible evidence in the name of the defendant on the purchase of the house and on the advice of his father. It was agreed, nevertheless, to pay the costs of the oath and to seek the plaintiff's privilege, the same trial court and the appellate court did not honor, after examining all the evidence on record, Fixed a question of fact, which the High Court upheld in the investigation, whether illegal or not Illegal verdict identifies legal weakness; Supreme Court dismisses plea and refuses to grant appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Shahdad Kot lawyer
