Find a Lawyer

SHAKIL AHMAD versus THE STATE

The FIR was immediately filed in the definitions of Articles (a), (b) and (c) of the evidence; all four of the prosecution's witnesses, including the four injured prosecution witnesses, fully supported the prosecution's case before the trial court. Yes, the defense was unsuccessful despite the lengthy defense. The prosecutor's story did not interfere. There was no previous background of enmity between the parties and no false interference of the accused was possible. The record proved that no witnesses Had no enmity against any of the accused; Arrow was accompanied, seventeen people were injured in the five casualties, which showed that there was no exaggeration in this case as the number of accused remained absconding for several months and the other accused was released after several months. Was arrested and also recovered Kalashnikov and Kalashnikov live bullets, the pistol and other material was known to be more respectable and reliable and prescription introduced by another accused in the Story of Prosecution, whose incident. Learn about a serious and abusive lawsuit and its accompanying accused b Was to come. Kalashnikovs were recovered on the identification of one of the suspects and the firearms expert's report was not likely to be forged, all the suspects were identified during the identification parade, the prosecution successfully defended any suspicion against the suspects. Was accused of being out of the shadows. Was fully maintained by the trial court against the accused, immigration advocate from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer