MALIK MUSHTAQ JILLANI versus THE STATE
Section 616161 A Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Termination of Articles 302/234/109/34 and further prosecution were designated in the FIR with special principles Prosecution witnesses supported the version of the prosecution Copies of statements of the prosecution's witnesses were delivered. Accused of being prosecuted under Section 265 against the accused, CCP was not to be charged in the trial after the trial, there was sufficient material available on record against the accused, to seek the accused after the trial. The trial in the order challan case was made for good reasons and did not face any illegal interference. The High Court Petition was dismissed under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Fort Abbas lawyer
