MANZOOR AHMED versus GUL MUHAMMAD
A VII, R 2 Laws of Martyrs (10 of 1984), Article 163 Special suit with the plaintiff to recover the money of the plaintiff's suit supported the special pledge case, but the defendant sued under refusal. The appellate court also dismissed the case against the decision of the trial filed by the defendant and refused to state the decision to refuse the hearing, taking special oath under Article 163 of the testimony of the law. No negative view can be raised on the grounds of denial, the two courts did not rely solely on the effect of denial. Respondents seeking special pledges, but who relied on relevant evidence presented by the parties, have been shown to be inaccurate or non-readable on the record by the courts below, the High Court refused to intervene.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Okara lawyer