EJAZ AHMED SHEIKH versus THE STATE
Defining Section 9A (v) / 10A Evidence, Benimarz was not given the opportunity to prove a few misconceptions about his sources, proven anonymous transactions, and to examine the relevant prosecution witnesses, including anyone Was not included. In addition to the trial, a defense witness who had explained his sources, was still denied the right to investigate prosecution witnesses, the trial court, thus ignoring the previous law of that case. The decision I made was set aside and the case was remanded to the Accountability Court so that the accused could be instructed to reconsider the allegations that are related to Banimaras and have full opportunity to explain their position and present evidence. Provided that, if it is guaranteed, by law, the accused has already passed more than one and a half Was. His conviction and the circumstances under which he was granted bail during the trial
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Narowal lawyer
