Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus THE STATE

Section 426 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b), in its judgment, the suspension of the appeal for the trial court, itself, concludes that the conduct of the accused and his family is evident. Is that they had no aggressive design against the rival party. The incident in the home of the prosecutor's witness, the case did not encourage trust The filing of the FIR by the complainant relied on the evidence presented by the prosecutor, therefore, was not safe in the circumstances. The explanation given by the accused party about the incident was more mysterious, even though the applications filed by the accused for suspension of their sentences were dismissed, but more than a year has passed since then. Even after 2 1/2 years of conviction, there was no possibility of hearing appeals soon. The rival parties were right, will be considered by the High Court at the hearing of important appeals. jobs for advocates from Wahi hassain lawyer