The specific performance case of the plaintiff's sale agreement was that the contract was implemented not for investment purposes but for the sale of a suit shop, as the plaintiff's witnesses expressly stated in the plaintiff's The witnesses were not denied execution. Minor witnesses in the agreement dismissed that in his presence, the defendants had affixed their signatures / thumb impressions and received a substantial sum of money from the claimant for the sale of the suit shop, the contested statement of the witnesses in connection with the deal, In the circumstances, the defendant failed to produce such evidence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
