Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL ANJUM versus MST. FARZANA KAUSAR

Section 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), the judgment of the constitutional petition for the recovery of articles of Article 199 dowry was reversed, under which the decision of the Family / Court was reversed and the witness who was an independent witness , The appellant's judgment against him was suspended. The plaintiff's neighbor, who gave full details of the contentious articles on the dowry receipt, presented the plaintiff on several dowry articles, while the defendant did not provide any evidence for the return of the dowry articles and even Neither did he summon his witness. Prove that the dowry articles were returned, evidence preparation was available in favor of the plaintiff about which he claimed that the defendant had claimed that he had returned the same through the panchayat, which itself The only acknowledgment was that the dowry articles were welcomed by him, therefore, there was no error in the decisions of the two courts below, which gave the dowry decision up to fifty percent of the amount claimed, on both sides. According to the facts below the constitutional petition, there was no case for interference in the results. F amount owed was deleted. It was directed by the High Court to submit it to the Family Court in five equal persons. famous supreme court advocate from Islamabad lawyer