MUHAMMAD SHAIQ HUSSAIN versus SAMIR MANZOOR KHOKHAR
Article 115 and O. XVIII, R5 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 2 (1) (e) raise such objection to the High Court for the first time in review of the evidence of any case in the second case. In both cases it was permissible. Recorded on the same dates, at the end of each statement, it was confirmed that the judge of the case was legally singed by the petitioner (defendant), but he had not raised any objection. This was an error in the process. Do not claim that he was not present before the court or that such verification was invalid under his statement. The petitioner did not raise such an objection in the memorandum of appeal. No prejudice was inflicted on the applicant by the alleged irregularities in the procedure. The review was considered a deliberate decision not to sincerely dismiss the High Court's request for review.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
