GHULAM MUSTAFA KHAN versus ASHIQ HUSSAIN
Limit of suit filed on Sections 6 and 24 (1) of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 4, 5 and 12 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 before the suit empire, 15 2002 2002 Appointment was set before the court on 16 3, 2002, when the court time expired, on 16 16 2002, the plaintiff was instructed to submit to Zar Som within 30 days and the plaintiff paid the sum of Zar 4 Som 15 4 The petition was filed in 2002. It has been claimed that when the 30th day of filing the case was on 13th 2002, the collection of gold by the plaintiff on 15 4 2002 was clearly out of bounds by law and that the section in Punjab Violation of the provisions of 24 (1). The petition filed by the defendant under the Pre-Emission Act, 1991 was simultaneously dismissed by the courts below the validity suit, though it was filed on 15, 2002, but to the day when the court time was up, On that day no order was made to collect Zar-e-Som and was made on 16 3 2002. If the date of the institution suit was deleted, the period of amendment was 30 days, 14 4 2002, But that date was a Sunday, and according to Section 4 of the Courts Limitation Act, 1908, any time the limitation was removed, the expiry of the time when the courts were closed. When the courts reopened the deposit on 15th 2002, when the court reopened, it was legal when the courts rightly rejected the application for dismissal of the case. Interrupted a constitutional request
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Gujrat lawyer