Find a Lawyer

SHAMIM KAUSAR BUKHARI versus MST. SYEDA KHIZRA SULTAN

In announcing the writ of writing of the && Su 42 lawsuit and the execution of the sale agreement, the plaintiff's evidence claimed that she was the owner of 2 / share of the suit land and in favor of the defendant. Regarding the section, the sale challenged the sale deadline. It is alleged that such sale process is the result of fraud and collusion. Apart from this, the defendants could not prove through any evidence that the accused was a woman who was the victim of the sale. Given, the sale was considered and the sub-registrar appeared before the court below, dismissing the cases filed by the plaintiffs in the search of evidence, which shows that the plaintiff's rights In the proceedings and the sale proceedings were presented to the plaintiff, the matter was reviewed by the High Court that the defendant And not only did not ahdh. Did she all appear before the Registrar and was allegedly a descendant of Sel David Fraud and Colisev and the extent of the plaintiff's rights was invalid? immigration advocates phone number from Panjan Kisan lawyer