Find a Lawyer

IBRAHIM SAID versus ZAHID SHAH

One of the appeals which was rejected in connection with the original order was the O & O XLI, R1 Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), the attachment to the judicial fees on the memorandum of appeal of Articles 6 and 28, the appeal. The seller was not related to court fees. The appeal was pending for more than two-and-a-half years, but during that period, the appellate court did not instruct the appellant to collect fees from the court on the memo of the appeal and the appeal was filed on its date. Would have been done. The original offer, despite the fact that the court fee was provided after the limitation period, if the court fee was later attached, would not cause the appeal to be time-barred because the appellate court applied to the appellant's memo. Failed to provide specific time for receiving court-related fees and his appeal was dismissed without specifying any such special time, failing to exercise jurisdiction that properly appropriated him Was, decided by the appellate court and approved by the appellate court, which was set aside by the High Court and the matter was R. Provide specific time for appealing court fees on the memo of the appellant and then with the instruction to decide the appeal on merit as per law. famous lower court advocate from Kurram lawyer