Find a Lawyer

IMTIAZ KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) / evidence 34 Definition of proof was filed immediately with the FIR and neither misidentification raised the question as to why the parties did not know each other well nor had false opportunities or alternatives. Was involved, the statements of the prosecution witnesses were fully corroborated by the medical evidence. In the FIR, which was equipped with a knife, an attempt was made to injure the victim, but he could not deliver the same sentence which the trial court had given to the co-accused, giving him the benefit of the doubt. Was also convicted of assault with a deadly weapon. And the deceased was retained due to injuries, but the sentence for one of the two accused, who was 16/17 years, was changed from Section 302 (b), PPC to Section 308, PPC. And his death sentence was set aside and his murder cited. To the extent this was answered in the affirmative, he was given a 14-year RI with instructions to pay the dues to the deceased's legal heirs. Extreme injury, in which case there were no mitigating circumstances available and his death sentence was confirmed and the extent to which the murder was answered. family advocate from Bhimbar lawyer