Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIR versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Sections 10 and 30 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), section 42 cancellation of allotment suit for land allotment / scheme declaration less than 15 years were allotted under 15 years. It was ordered to hand over the fact that the supply of possession was recorded in the Waketty, and since the Allotty had brought the land under cultivation and was residing there, it was said that the Allotment was given without notice to the Allotment. The trial court had ruled against such cancellation. , But the appellate court, excluding the judgment and order of the trial court, dismissed only the case on which the allotment of the allottee / plaintiff was held, it was canceled that the allottee had not obtained possession and he was on record. I had established the proof of dedication completely. That the Allies were given property according to law. It was held in his possession that he had paid all the installments and that he had fulfilled all the conditions of the allotment. The appellate court had failed to read the evidence, dismissing the case through the allottee, and disputed judgment and order. Worked with no jurisdiction, approving the document. Its amended jurisdiction, aside from the judgment and decree passed by the appellate court, restores the trial court's ruling and order. list of supreme court advocates from Jehanian lawyer