Find a Lawyer

MST. SARDARAN versus MST. RASOOLAN

Received a gift in favor of the wife by Article Q 42 Laws of Martyrs (1984 1984 10 of 1984), Arts 119, 122 and 133 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), R 42 Husband Plaintiff (Donor's Other Legal Inheritance) The trial court was charged with declaring that the gift was given during the trial of Mirzat Almut, but the appellate court upheld the same suit, which the plaintiff recorded in his testimony from the operative part of the trial. Brought enough material that the donor was not conscious The defendant's witnesses examined the donor plaintiff's illness that the donor was 65 years old, donated to the cows. The change was approved in the area, where the donor was not resident, and both villages were not different plaintiffs. The Revenue Officer's statements of the defendant's witnesses were contradictory in nature to prove the reality of the gifts and the alterations, and he failed to prove the contents of the alterations in the gifts to the appellant in the matter of law. The High Court did not turn to the trial court's reasoning. The High Court accepted the review petition, set aside the appellate court's improper judgment / order, and the trial court approved with the observation that the defendant Will be entitled to a portion of the disputed property. The intentions of Islam lawer from fb area from Mari Indus lawyer