Find a Lawyer

SHAMIM versus THE STATE

The testimony of Section 9 (c) prosecutor's testimony was that the two accused were found to have opium and hashish from their home and that the accused, who was one of the wives, said that the two accused produced the keys of Elmira and recovered the opium. The prosecution's case shows that the accused was living with her husband in the same house as the wife of one of the accused at the time. The question is whether the two accused were in possession of the house and allegedly the property of the accused was recovered at the request of his wife. Of the two accused, she belonged to her husband and was not responsible for the prosecution's case. It was not the case that the accused was the victim of selling opium from her husband's house or moving it to another place. It was no doubt free to say that the female accused had only 2kg of opium while a large quantity of hashish and opium were recovered from the human being. Her husband and other suspects from the same house did not consider the accused to be natural because she was the wife of only one accused because the prosecution woman failed to prove her case against the accused without any suspicion. Had been And they were convicted by the trial court law firms from Sehwan lawyer