Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD MEHMOOD ALIAS BHOLLA versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) / A 337A (i) Definition of evidence, reduction of the complaint to the convict, who was also injured in the incident, was the mother of the deceased and it is not credible that the complainant assisted in the presence of the original culprit. Will make a false statement. In the absence of her husband in the complainant's house, a witness of the prosecution cannot be disqualified. The accused could not be named as the close relative of the complainant and the husband of the eyewitnesses, who could not remain in any doubt about the identity of the accused. Defendant's testimony provided evidence to establish his alleged enmity Defendant's version is that the victim was killed during a robbery incident in the complainant's home because no such suggestion was made to the prosecution's witnesses Nor did the accused take any such action. The statements of CRPC's defense witnesses in their statement under section 2342 were not in accordance with the request for defense. In the form of any proposal, the accused did not take the complainant in his statement under cross-examination, 34 342. The CRPC prosecution, no doubt, had to prove its own case rather than take advantage of the defense's weaknesses, but that too was not open. The ocular account presented by the complainant and the prosecutor's witness was fully endorsed by medical evidence in defense of the taking of the contentious requests during the prosecution, and further confirmation of the theft was made on the indictment of the prosecution. However, the motive was not proven and although beyond reasonable doubt it cannot be established what happened before the incident which led to the murder of the late. law websites from Garh Maharaja lawyer