Find a Lawyer

SH. MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Section 8 Punjab Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1975, R4 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Authorized to withhold the written development of Arts 199 and 212 mandamus, on this basis the Selection Board for the applicant's development Revoked approval of the recommendation. Among the major and minor convictions imposed by the Service Tribunal and which were affirmed by the Supreme Court, the breach of the applicant's terms regarding his terms and conditions of service. No, the service was expanded to examine orders approved by the tribunal's department. With regard to the terms and conditions of service of public servants, the authorities had no jurisdiction to issue a directive in the nature of mandams to force them to act in accordance with their already approved orders. Considering the initiation of inquiry in connection with some of the allegations, he resigned at the meeting of the selection board held during the approval of the constitutional petition on suspicion of his fitness because of irrelevant considerations. Following the recommendations, the applicants and Sinsar Min were fined a minor. The minority of the Selection Board and the competent authority cannot be considered as a factor disqualifying its approval. In the matter of publicity, the applicant was not dealt with in accordance with the rules and in a fair and equitable manner and did not issue a formal notification. The authority and, after that, the Super Session of the applicant without any legal authority, the High Court directed the Authority to submit the petitioner's case before the Select Board on its next matter. immigration advocates contact from Hub Inds Estate lawyer