Find a Lawyer

RAB NAWAZ KHAN versus THE CURATOR, ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS, BAHAWALPUR

Rr 3 (a) and 4 (1) (b) (i) in the Zoological Gardens, due to a reduction in salary scale and recovery of money, a notice was given to a civil servant who was responsible for It is alleged that his carelessness and inadequacy led to the death of two occupants and two others missing from the Zoological Gardens, where he was volunteering at the relevant time as a watchdog employee acknowledged that late in the night. I coughed and it happened. The inquiry officer considered the admissions made by public servants, which according to the inquiry report indicated the negligence of the public servant authority after hearing the public servants, it had reduced the pay scale at an early stage of its scale. Was charged and recovered Rs 40,000 as compensation. Regular inquiries from the government for damages were not made because a civil servant who served as municipality volunteered to perform his duty as a watchman himself. He also admitted that at the end of the night when he presented the incident, the competent officer had provided the public employee with a full opportunity to present his case and that the public servant had made any mistake in reporting the public servant. Could not indicate that the civil servant had failed to work, a watchman was expected to pay caution and, under his supervision, a fine of up to Rs 40,000 was paid to the government, But in the early stages of this scale, the pay reduction penalty was kept separate female advocates from Qambar Shahdatkot lawyer