DR. NISAR AHMAD versus SECRETARY HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE
Rr 4 (1) (b) (IA) (ii) (iiv) on a charge sheet on public servants for removal from the job, recovery of money and preventing increments, and on certain allegations of inquiry against them The penalties were levied against. Investigation officer found himself guilty of financial irregularities and violation of relevant rules without giving any reason or logic to the government employees. After consultation with the officer and the concerned department in-charge, the charge of the department could not be considered until it appeared as a witness and was not investigated by public servants but not only by the inquiry slip. And was held illegally. The relevant department did not appear as a witness. The penalty for collecting money from public servants was not only illegal, but also without telling the public servants that they were accused. How financial irregularities were committed by the government and no evidence was provided to the extent that Was fined for his removal from office by reason of employment. The authority to liaise with government employees without any solid evidence, with any kind of misconduct against government employees, lawfully violates any principles, orders to impose fines, on the one hand. Was laid off and civil servants were ordered to be reinstated
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
