IJAZ AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD AZAM
The complainant's argument that withholding proceedings under Articles 196 and 561A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 295A & 295C was, in fact, a complaint lodged against the accused and his co-accused under section 295C, PPC. Was made, but after inquiry the magistrate submitted a report under section 295A, the PPC was made, the result of which was wrong and the case was filed against him and his co-accused under section 295A. Was made, PPC was not recognized by the court without the validity of the court under the provisions of section 196, CRPC. Notice of any offense punishable under Chapter VI, PPC (offenses against the State), and especially Section 295A, PPC, in which the accused is acquitted by the trial court through trial court proceedings. Was called before, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Lakimarwat lawyer