Find a Lawyer

FAZL-E-HAQ versus THE STATE

Sections 302 (b) and 302 (c) of the testimony were admitted at the time, place of origin and the facts used for the murder of the victim were to be resolved only to resolve the question of whether the deceased died under the circumstances. As the prosecution's witnesses described. Or Section 342, CRP's reliance on a defense plea of the grave and sudden provocation presented by the defendants in which the accused was charged with the purpose of assisting the defendant's home complainant and defendant. Settle the dispute between the father in law. The villager about a piece of agricultural land that the accused wanted to reconcile between them was his father-in-law living in the house opposite the site of the incident, which was stated in the accused's law. The father's father-in-law was also allegedly present at the suspect's home, but site investigations prepared by the investigating officer and the draftsman were silent about the father's presence in the suspect's law at the suspect's home, even when the dispute arose. He was between the accused and the in-laws of the other villagers; Lidd had to go to the house, which was located just opposite the suspect's home where the incident took place. On the record to explain why the deceased and the complainant chose to go to the accused's house for reconciliation instead of the accused's father-in-law's father-in-law and never asked other participating villagers to join the inquiry. There was no independent evidence on record to show that there was a dispute between them at the relevant time. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Phagwar lawyer