Find a Lawyer

MUBARAK ALI versus THE STATE

The testimony of section 2302 (b) of the testimony was dismissed by the trial court on the same evidence that the two accompanying accused in the incident were acquitted; the two witnesses mentioned in the FIR did not support the prosecution's case and One of them appeared in defense as the complainant's statement from the accused was not confirmed by any independent evidence and only the evidence could not prove the accused's conviction in this case the suspect's participation was suspicious. Was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances. list of supreme court advocates from Kundina lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes