Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus THE STATE

Section 302/148/149 Testimony of evidence Both the deceased, who were real brothers and sisters, were executed during the day and the complainant and other witnesses were residents of the same area and were located near the site of the incident. The witnesses who were present on the occasion at the relevant time of the incident were natural and understandable, Syed said the witnesses were related to the deceased, but there was nothing to show that they had the accused to be falsely implicated in the case. Was the former enmity with. Police were immediately notified and the type of day, time and arms used during the incident was recognized. Medical evidence was supported in the ocular account cited by the prosecution's witnesses, the nature and eye witnesses described, confirmed by medical evidence, in which case the medical evidence supported it. Ocular evidence contradicts the two cases raised before the trial court to prove the defendant's request for self-defense, pleading for the defense of the defendant's incident in the overpopulated area, but the suspects heard Neither the defendant testified nor made any statement under section 4040 ((?)), the statements of the PCs of both the eyewitnesses affected the conviction and it was true that their conviction and conviction In order to maintain the conviction and conviction of the defendant's appeal and conviction, they were safely dismissed; Oil court correctly acquitted the accused because they did not hurt people and died during interrogation was not enough evidence to retrieve some of their evidence upon best advocate from Khangah Sharif lawyer