Find a Lawyer

SHAHZAD KHAN versus KHAWAJA M. ASIF

Section 14 (5) and (5a) of the Representation of the People (Conduct of Elections) Rules 1977, R 5 Appellant sought to cancel the nomination papers of the respondent candidate, on the basis that he had borrowed from the banks and his I was defaulted to them. These debts were repaid and various suits were pending and some were adjudicated, a case pending in the High Court, the High Court had ordered that the defendants not be considered defaulters until further orders. Whereas, in the second, the suit passed in favor of the bank was against any other party and the defendant was not the defendant in this case, the respondents disagreed with the obligation and execution of their personal guarantee and the court of law. I am under no obligation to repay the loan by the respondents. It has been determined so far that even though the respondent had paid the payment, with payment of 25% of the share repayment amount, the suit was ordered along with the cost of the fund and the law charge. Was. Respondents were instructed to submit the balance within seven days from the date of order otherwise their papers will be canceled. when you need a advocate from Hyderabad lawyer