Find a Lawyer

KHYZER HAYAT versus MEMBER (CONSOLIDATION), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Article 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973); Article 2 (185 (ol)) confirms the failure of the Consolidation Scheme for the failure of the land classification, stabilization scheme, such order by the Revenue Authorities. In which the High Court refused to interfere with the scheme taken by the applicants.The village's re-stabilization was that the classification of the land was wrong. The challenge was not challenged by any of the rightsholders; Since none of the rights holders came forward to resolve their grievances, it will only be pointed out that stability was neither discriminatory nor negatively affecting the rights of the rights holders. The process was not only complicated but also time consuming, which was neither time consuming, nor once again, without proper justification and cancellation, reaching the quarter in which the revenue was reinforced due to some minor mistakes. Any errors or omissions can be corrected. All legal exceptions to stability depend on the wishes of the majority for which the appropriate forum can be referred to. Appeal denied by verification leave with Stability Scheme denied famous supreme court advocate from Lalamusa lawyer