PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus MST. UMAT UL BASIT
Section 13 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Removal of Tenants The absence of tenants was running a school in the premises of the rent issued to the district attorney. On the basis of default and damage to property, the rental controller rejected the withdrawal request, but the appellate court allowed the appeal and the withdrawal order was granted. Authorities dismissed the request under section 12 (2) CPC on this request. It was requested on the request that they were not. In the process, the appellate court rejected the petition under section 12 (2) CPC because the notice was sent to the office of the authorities twice and the district attorney also did not have the approval of the High Court approved by the appellate court. The Secretary Education was fully served but the official player of any kind) was the agent of the Government for the purpose of pursuing the proceedings against the Government, so also the reason for the rnment issued by the notice of the judicial service to the District Attorney. That was, the service rendered by the government was denied by the appellate court refusing to interfere with the order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Hasilpur lawyer