Find a Lawyer

HAMESH GUL versus MST. TASLEEM KAMAL

A. XVI, Rr 1, 7 and 14 List of witnesses who failed to list the witnesses, but the trial court allowed the defendants to examine the witnesses on payment of costs, the defendant testified in the trial court. Challenged the order of O. XVI, R 1, under the provisions of CPC, if the parties were required to present a list in court. O XVI, R 7, After settling the CPC cases, the witnesses who proposed to call either within 7 days to give evidence or to present evidence, however, the court was present in a court Was given the option to instruct person / person. Although he / her name cannot be included in the list of witnesses presented under oh XVI, R1, the CPC provisions of R14 of A XVI CPC also granted the court wide authority. o Seeking his or her own contract is also required to furnish strangers as witnesses or to present a document to them on a date and the court has the authority to inspect it or to file such document with the trial court. In order to allow the defendant to pay. The costs of investigating witnesses who were present in court did not commit any illegal interference or interference in the guarantee of any irregularity. property advocates from Swatmingora lawyer