Find a Lawyer

ZIAULLAH versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AFZAL

Article 13 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 144 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application, default removal request for payment of monthly rent of shop fast controller, after alternative employment and daily newspaper After I announced, the action was taken. Following the eviction order against the tenant ex parte, the landlord filed an application to occupy the shop on which the action was taken, and despite no personal services being imposed on the tenant's notice After the notice of occupancy was issued, the executing court issued a warrant for the occupation, on which Belf submitted a report that the tenant refused to accept the notice and the landlord had a vacant shop. Not ready to surrender possession No witness was presented on the warrant whose presence the tenant denied notice Accept confiscation warrants, however, were ordered to break suit locks and doors, with the police using the order to control the entire practice of the purchase withdrawal request, when used by the rent controller for about two months. It was not guaranteed under the law. The earlier order executed in this way also applied to the order and the matter was handled only on speculation. Petitions for rejecting pre-order orders were dismissed and the applicant failed to appear in court despite numerous modalities, no cause for non-filing was presented and the disputed property had already been submitted to the decree. The Holders Appellate Court observed in the appeal that before the execution criminal advocate from Chak Jhumra lawyer