Find a Lawyer

SPEEN BACHA versus MST. NEELAM

A. XVII R 1 (1) The exercise of powers to verify the application The jurisdiction and boundary court was not obliged to re-hear the matter in the exercise of such powers as to reconsider the appeal against its own decision. Because the grounds stated in the review request were not covered. Of any of the conditions set forth in the provisions of A. XLVII, R1 (1), the CPC applicants did not make their objections based on the discovery of a new and important case, nor on the evidence that led to the action. After all, they had neither knowledge nor reason for it. There is no evidence of wrongdoing or misrepresentation on the face of the record, nor for any reason for which they have not been able to present evidence to the applicant's arguments in support of their review request. There were no pending errors in the judgment pending and the decision under consideration does not appear on the face of the record by the applicants, nor was there any other reason for justifying the decision. The application was deleted lawer from fb area from Narowal lawyer