UNITED BANK LIMITED versus SINDH TECH INDUSTRIES LTD
Orders on section 1 (2002), filed separately under section 10 (2) and 9 (5) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908, section 12 (2), section 12 (2), CPC) were filed, while The applicant was aware of the order. 2 12 2001 The applicant's request was that since 1987, he was not living at the address given by the three modes of return. Any time he moved from K to R, he had the plaintiff's bank informed of his change of address.The applicant did not say that the plaintiff had intentionally shown his wrong address. The wrong statement was made and as it was presented to the court for judgment / decree, the applicant may obtain a separate order from the satisfactory court stating that he was barred from applying under section 10 of the Ordinance for any good reason. Such application had to be made within thirty days from the date of knowledge, but after such expiry it was made mostly by the court under CP Dismissed the application under section 12 (2) of the CK
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
