Find a Lawyer

AYAZ AHMED versus THE STATE

Section 497 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 2 (s), 16, 32 (1) (2), 78 and 156 (1) (8) (14) (77) Grant of charges against the accused Thi \ raw wool import tried to smuggle black Kenya tea sm by imposing its description, price, weight and classification on import cover \ to be smuggled goods, listed in sub-clause. In one of the categories (i) and (ii) the imported goods of conte black t import of section 2 (s) of the Customs Act, 1969 were a smuggled item, to claim it, later in this section. It was notified in a federal government-issued notification for the purpose. In the absence of a notification asked to draw the complimentary results of section 156 (1) (8) of the Customs Act 1969, section 2 (s) of the Customs Act 1969, in the absence of the notification, smuggling and the penalties would not be attracted to section 156 (8) of the Customs Act, 1969 and most of the charges were made under Sections (9), (14), (77) of Section 156 of the Customs Act, 1969 Will come who was No more than three years in prison and no penalty online advocate from Bhuawana lawyer