Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ


A. XXI, R 32 The Special Relief Act (I of 1877), the plaintiff's suit for a declaration in relation to the objection to the decree adopted in section 42 of a declaration suit that he would not build any ? The plaintiff's application on the trial property was transferred under O XXI, R 32, the CPC was accepted before the Appellate Court. The defendant's position was that no decree was ever granted against him and The order to enforce it was illegal, only a decree if specific performance related to the contract or order was applied by the court, provided that the decision-maker intentionally failed to comply with the same action. The same action can be initiated against which a decree has been passed, and in the present case no such order can be issued. Was passed against the defendant and in fact the defendant made a statement and the case was settled for his work.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Kamalia Musa lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.