Find a Lawyer

MIRZA BASHIR MUHAMMAD versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/DISTRICT COLLECTOR OKARA

Arts 24 and 199 Constitutional application to protect property rights Applicants' land was proposed to be used for construction of the stadium The applicants agreed to grant their land subject to an alternative land grant. The constitutional administration and the applicants were not impressed with the revenue record, but despite the positive report from the field staff, the deputy commissioner of the constitutional application acknowledged the seizure of the land but claimed that there was nothing in the record. To show whether compensation for alternative land or compensation crops, etc., was ever claimed by the competent authority of the applicant for approval of alternative land in exchange for its ownership, however, the Board of Revenue justified It was said that the applicants should get this right. Contact the Provincial Sports Board to finalize the acquisition process and the compensation was determined through the District Collector Integrity Course considered in Article 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan, and the process for seizing this property. Applicants were not paid compensation while the same Deputy Commissioner recommended the applicants' case. The applicants were claiming that they were understood and promised for alternative land in exchange for their land used for the construction of the Board of Revenue's Stadium View, which was completely unrealistic and technical and not even conceptualized. It may be that the constitutional application of the Board was allowed and the matter was entrusted to the Board of Revenue (Colonies). ask a advocate free from Murree lawyer