Find a Lawyer

SHARAFAT ALI versus THE STATE

Section 302 Testimony of Evidence At this point, no description of the presence of eyewitnesses could be recorded, no one was presented as witness at the scene of the incident, nor were both allegedly witnesses to the witness. There was no business or agricultural land. At the time of the incident, the prosecution reportedly said the witnesses' presence was not a source of doubt and confidence because the prosecutor's witness admitted in his cross-examination that he did not mention the names of the eyewitnesses and the accused. The plan developed by him was that the post-mortem report of the victim's prosecution had proved that the incident occurred in the early hours of the morning and there was no observation that the period between the victim's death and his post-mortem was carried out by the doctor. Was given by the post-mortem, the crime contract does not meet with the prosecutor at the time of the incident given by the prosecutor. Referring to the prosecution was 7 mm, but the victim was hurt. The diameter was 1 cm 1 5 cm and the injury to such diameter could not have been caused by the emptying and The rifle was not captured. The motive of the licensed rifle recovered on the suspect's identity did not prove that the alleged eyewitness was revealed, his presence on the occasion was suspected that the confrontation between the account and medical evidence. Was present, in the cases, was unable to confirm that beyond any doubt the defendant was able to create a dagger in the story of the prosecution, such an accusation was made that law websites from Vehari lawyer