Find a Lawyer

SYED MUHAMMAD ZAHIR SHAH versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR

Article 212 (3) Applicant of Appointment was appointed as Junior Clerk as Special Case with no Codal Response Respondent, who had good academic ability and had long experience in Junior There was a better candidate for the position of applicant in all respects. Clerk but his services were terminated The Service Tribunal ordered that the respondent be reinstated as a Junior Clerk with full back benefits. The applicant had failed to identify any legal flaw in the designated decision of the service tribunal and could not present a case involving sufficient questions. Appeal for leave to appeal for appeal by the Supreme Court under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution. online advocate from Dhirkot lawyer