Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE

Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) was promoted to the highest level of public servants for the restoration of salaries but when knowing that the position was to be filled through direct recruitment, the authorities Changed them. The order to recover their important posts and their salaries was also approved, before the government tribunal dismissed the service tribunal, the department's offers and appeals from public servants were rejected by the service tribunal. , Though the administration was prevented from collecting salary differences. As a servant, the authorities could not penalize the reduction of office bearers who were not appointed to the appointment of posts through the appointment of public servants. All the officials, together, found that these posts were directly recruited. Would be filled in, so it wasn't. The reduction of positions as a matter of development through appointments, appointments notwithstanding, public servants will never be considered as promoted. The service tribunal did justice by directing that public servants be promoted to advanced positions. The salaries made against them will not be made public employees against whom they acted. During the relevant period the post was entitled to the payment of such post in high office; the decision by the service tribunal which did not face any illegal proceedings was refused to appeal. top advocates from Mari Indus lawyer