Find a Lawyer

DR. KHALIL-UR-REHMAN BHATTI versus PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Lecturers / Senior Registrar Professors: Article 33 of the Constitution of Pakistan & 33 (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application by the Medical and Dental Council of Pakistan, using its authority under Section 33 of the Medical and Dental Council Ordinance, 1962. , Set the rules for the appointment of an Associate. Along with the professors and examiners, it included beer, which states that qualification for a specific position is stated as the rule's priority as a petitioner. It was claimed that the Council had framed the rules without jurisdiction and the Sections of the Medical and Dental Council Ordinance, 1962 Under section 33 (2) (d), the council was empowered to recommend the minimum qualifications and experience required of teachers for appointment to medical appointments in the dental and dental institutions and wherever. The Council did not provide while specifying the minimum qualification, the minimum qualification could set the priority in the Council while extracting its powers from Section 33 of the Medical and Dental Council Ordinance, 1962, the only impeachment rules and regulations. It was shown that prior to granting the qualifications, it was specifically stated that the qualifications mentioned in these rules were preferred by the Council. , Which was subject to section 33 (2) (d) of the Medical and Dental Council Ordinance, 1962, which could have written the least qualification, but could not provide a preferential order. The appointment of the OU will be left at the sole discretion of the AU, while Tourette Council did not have the authority to determine the rank or priority, while the rules stipulated that the minimum qualifications for various positions were stated in the posts. Finally advocates from Muzaffarabad lawyer