Find a Lawyer

LAL BADSHAH versus MAHBOOB SHAH

The plaintiff for the discrimination against section 13 & pre 13 before the plaintiff found out about the sale of the land before it became public information and it is sufficient to publicly claim that in this case it is sufficient to disclose Was. The plaintiff was aware of the pre-sale transaction, as he said, in the circumstances that were not made in a timely manner by the plaintiff, in a period of two weeks, the student was more likely to make such a pool More time was granted, but the motion was made by the plaintiff eight days after the proposed period of two weeks, so there is no justification for delaying the eight days between seeking notice of the petition and the trial court's notice. Was not, in the circumstances, excluded the right to refuse the student. To the law patent advocate from Samundri lawyer