MUKHTAR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE
Section 392 Definition of Evidence No FIR was nominated in the FIR Only details of the two accused were given by the complainant, but no identification parade was held after the arrest of the accused when he was called by the prosecution witness. Status checked and nominated. Both alleged witnesses had clearly stated that they did not identify any of the accused at the time of the commission of the crime, nothing was recovered from the complainant's isolation statement, other than that it was improved. ? The case was not supported by any independent source. There was no evidence that the case against the accused had taken advantage of the suspicion, the accused was acquitted on the basis of his conviction and conviction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Rahwali lawyer
