Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAFAR versus THE STATE

Section 2? (b) (c) and 34 34 Definition of Evidence According to the prosecution, the purpose of the event was that the accused, who was employed by the deceased to oversee his crops, was found to be negligent in his duties, The victim molested him and, in retaliation for his humiliation, the accused killed the victim's playwright, who killed the deceased because of `` siege '' when he found his wife with a deceased person who committed rape. Was suddenly outraged, and a servant was sued by a master who had been fired on the master of aggression and murder, even in the face of negligence. It was not a matter of force which would force the servant to kill his master, but when the question of siege was involved, the servant could take action against him. The motive, however, was not convinced by the prosecution's motion to move forward by the prosecution, but the prosecution had accepted it in its own way and not as an indictment by the prosecution trial court. The incident occurred on the question of siege which attracted the provisions of section 302 (c), indicating the PPC conviction. The trial court had approved the case against N, but the accused was sentenced to seven years in prison. Instead of life imprisonment under RP Section 302 (c), section 302 (b), PPC under PPC advocates from Kazi Ahmed lawyer