Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAEEM SARWAR versus THE STATE


Section 265F (2) (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Investigation Officer, Complainant investigating Constitutional Petition, filed a petition in the trial court seeking the witness officer as witness. The investigation was exchanged after which the accused filed a case. It was argued that the police did not submit any supplementary challan and the investigating officer did not record any fresh statement under Section 161, CRPC or the CRPC prepared trial court rejected the complainant's request. Had done. The complainant filed an application to seek the Investigating Officer. The opinion of the Syed Investigation Officer did not record any statement under section 161, CR PC and did not submit any material. According to Section 265F (3), the police were not bound by the opinion of the CRPC. The complainant did not contact the court. It was removed accordingly

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Jampur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.