Find a Lawyer

FARRUKH BASHIR versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD

Articles 1, 5, 10, 21, 23 and 24, Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) disqualifying candidates on medical grounds, serving as applicants / doctors, appearing in CSS Exam And were temporarily disqualified from having a defective approach. Being physically fit or ineligible due to overweight and hypertension, etc., and being unable to pay for duties efficiently, in the present case the Central Medical Board or the Appellate Board did not record their opinion. They have been notified of defects reported by. According to the requirements of the Physical Examination of Candidates for Competitive Examination, Regulations, 2001, two out of three candidates were likely to interfere with the effective discharge of duties, which was mandatory in the nature of the candidate who successfully took the exam. Should not be eliminated. Unless the defect is of a nature that would hamper the efficient performance of his duties as an officer, in the case of two candidates, only the doctor said that the candidates had made a favorable report regarding the decision of the Central Medical Board. But, sitting as a member of the appellate board, he said the candidates were inconsistent. The doctor dismissed his opinion as a member of the appellate board and could not be relied upon. Candidates were also found to be overweight when the civil surgeon expressed his opinion before the High Court. , That weight alone will not stand effectively. The duties and regulations of the duties include only the minimum weight and maximum weight advocates from Phool nagar lawyer