Find a Lawyer

ASHIQUE ALI versus LAL MUHAMMAD KHAN

For the specific performance of the contract for sale, the Section 12 suit claimed that the suit property was transferred to the defendant's father by the Department of Population but the defendant's father died and the defendant died before the permanent transfer was issued. As Ali's sole heir to the deceased, he agreed to sell. The plaintiff further claimed that the accused was paid as money while the remaining amount was sold to the plaintiff for consideration of the sale agreement registered under the suit property. The deadline was to be paid at the time of enrollment, but the defendant failed to perform the required work. A lawsuit was filed for special performance. The execution of the nominee's agreement was proved to be unconstitutional, and the other witness presented by the plaintiff also proved the actions taken by the plaintiff by the plaintiff. Or consider the finding of the courts under this agreement without the parties being considered, except that it was without basis because the agreement clearly stated the amount from which the defendant was paid. Was considered because the plaintiff proved his version to the plaintiff by presenting the necessary evidence while the defendant Failure to present any, including evidence in support of their respective petitions, including whether the agreement was fraudulent or based on fraudulent courts below, did not in any circumstances justify the exclusion of judicial decisions and court orders. The records were not based on evidence, were kept by the superior court in the exercise of its amended jurisdiction immigration advocates email from Nowshera lawyer